Zack wrote:![]()
WIN!
Zack wrote:![]()
Boo, that means the race in Australia will probably have lighting issues, especially with shadows over the track. And I don't mind waking up in the night, makes the race more interesting for me.phil1993 wrote:Just seen that quali for Oz is on at 6am and the race at 7am. Gonna be sleepy...



so as this year's result, ferrari 1-2 - then they'll win both titles...... i'd say, nah....it ain't going to happen this year, mark down my words.iceman1 wrote:Interesting Statistics
In 2009 Brawn started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 2004, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 2000, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 1998, McLaren started with a 1-2 in the first race, and won both championships.
In 1996, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 1992, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.

it is quite interesting stats. i believe that Ferrari might win the title but the driver's championship could pan out differentlymegasyxx wrote:so as this year's result, ferrari 1-2 - then they'll win both titles...... i'd say, nah....it ain't going to happen this year, mark down my words.iceman1 wrote:Interesting Statistics
In 2009 Brawn started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 2004, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 2000, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 1998, McLaren started with a 1-2 in the first race, and won both championships.
In 1996, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 1992, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
just a gut feeling![]()

Unfortunately no real KURASHUUUU's this weekendZack wrote:![]()
No, honestly think about it. Even if Alonso had 0.6ms(donald29 wrote:If Vettel hadn't have had his problem I believe people wouldn't be shouting down the new rules. Alonso was closing him down and in his words "preparing to attack" I think we'd have had a great battle between those two in the closing laps. I say give it time and the last thing we need is a snap reactionary decision to make two mandatory pitstops. The media are over-reacting wildly and some of the drivers just need to STFU and get on with it for a few races.



Zack wrote:![]()

Also, it's Bahrain. Anyone expecting a good race from there is wildly optomistic.donald29 wrote:If Vettel hadn't have had his problem I believe people wouldn't be shouting down the new rules. Alonso was closing him down and in his words "preparing to attack" I think we'd have had a great battle between those two in the closing laps. I say give it time and the last thing we need is a snap reactionary decision to make two mandatory pitstops. The media are over-reacting wildly and some of the drivers just need to STFU and get on with it for a few races.
plus one more thing......kimi won his first race @ ferrari last 2007 and went on to win the wdc that year. let's see if nando can emulate that as well....sdutt wrote:it is quite interesting stats. i believe that Ferrari might win the title but the driver's championship could pan out differentlymegasyxx wrote:so as this year's result, ferrari 1-2 - then they'll win both titles...... i'd say, nah....it ain't going to happen this year, mark down my words.iceman1 wrote:Interesting Statistics
In 2009 Brawn started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 2004, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 2000, Ferrari started with a 1-2 and won both championships.
In 1998, McLaren started with a 1-2 in the first race, and won both championships.
In 1996, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
In 1992, Williams started with a 1-2, and won both championships.
just a gut feeling![]()


I never said Alonso would overtake Vettel, but I'm sure he'd have given it a go and we could have seen a good battle with Alonso attacking and Vettel defending.Zack wrote:No, honestly think about it. Even if Alonso had 0.6ms(donald29 wrote:If Vettel hadn't have had his problem I believe people wouldn't be shouting down the new rules. Alonso was closing him down and in his words "preparing to attack" I think we'd have had a great battle between those two in the closing laps. I say give it time and the last thing we need is a snap reactionary decision to make two mandatory pitstops. The media are over-reacting wildly and some of the drivers just need to STFU and get on with it for a few races.) in his pocket it is still not enough to overtake Vettel easily. So all in all you got to accept the show was not that great or boring for few
. Even compulsory 2 pitstops would hardly help. I think solution to the problem is Disallowing current double/triple/quadruple diffuser. Only way around this would be FIA to provide standard diffuser design IMO.
i kind of hope that there is no storm, because races there cannot get more inteeresting,, but it can come in quali perhapscformula1 wrote:2 mandatory stops? No thanks.
For Bahrain with a pointless twisty bit, the race was good. Expect drama and chaos in Melbourne, especially if they get storms like they did the other week.