it doesnt matter where he finished cuz 1 thing is for sure - he didnt finished in points positionshailf1 wrote:no he stays 15th i think, he was a lap ahead of the next guy.phil1993 wrote:Massa given a 20s penalty for speeding in the pits. Drops him to 17th
Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
- Liffonmelsmork
- kart driver
- Posts: 94
- Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 17:20
- Location: England
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
... Alonso was quite passive on podium ...*trauma* button too overtook him ...it was defend-able; he turned left after passing karun ...that was mistake!Liffonmelsmork wrote:
Better than a thousand hollow words is one word that brings PEACE -Buddha
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Michael Schumacher wasn't penalised then - I find that outrageous, frankly I thought the guy drove like a hooligan or like he was playing GP4 with the damage turned off. Compared to what Kubica got penalised for, Schumi should have been punished severely. Its a joke really he got away from that race scot-free.
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
I can only suggest you to watch race once again ..just hard racing in all casesswca92 wrote:Michael Schumacher wasn't penalised then - I find that outrageous, frankly I thought the guy drove like a hooligan or like he was playing GP4 with the damage turned off. Compared to what Kubica got penalised for, Schumi should have been punished severely. Its a joke really he got away from that race scot-free.
I'm not his fan- still I loved the way he drove in Canada. I loved his determination- it was the Old Schumi! Drivers who "give way" to passing are not racing drivers - they should find another job at public transportation.
Better than a thousand hollow words is one word that brings PEACE -Buddha
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
to be honest i think alonso should have won, he lost both position with traffic. looking at ferari's response to the gp in ferrari.com, nobody is happy with the result.Zack wrote:... Alonso was quite passive on podium ...*trauma* button too overtook him ...it was defend-able; he turned left after passing karun ...that was mistake!Liffonmelsmork wrote:
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
My guess is Mclaren still had some extra reserved.shailf1 wrote:to be honest i think alonso should have won, he lost both position with traffic. looking at ferari's response to the gp in ferrari.com, nobody is happy with the result.Zack wrote:... Alonso was quite passive on podium ...*trauma* button too overtook him ...it was defend-able; he turned left after passing karun ...that was mistake!Liffonmelsmork wrote:
Better than a thousand hollow words is one word that brings PEACE -Buddha
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
There is no point in defining a point... But there is a point in trying -Zack
[Videos]
Donate & support us
-ZACK- IO
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
What a race, but only two things ruined it; the traffic ahead of Alonso and RBR strategy. It seems that Ferrari back to the HUNT.
-
- F1 Routinier
- Posts: 3936
- Joined: 09 Aug 2009, 10:50
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Good review, Phil. Althought I would have given Petrov a 4 and Kubica a 6. Petrov deserves more as the start accident wasn't completely his fault and Michael was far worse. (at least for his standarts) Kubica deserves less in my opninion because he drove a bit too aggresive, especially in his battle with Adrian Sutil.
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Or should I say Alonso instead of Ferrari?
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Kubica done less than the usual he offers us, but still he did a good job. Sutil was breaking and Kubica was not to enter the pit. it was logical but with high risk.Tom Vandenhove wrote:Good review, Phil. Althought I would have given Petrov a 4 and Kubica a 6. Petrov deserves more as the start accident wasn't completely his fault and Michael was far worse. (at least for his standarts) Kubica deserves less in my opninion because he drove a bit too aggresive, especially in his battle with Adrian Sutil.
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Thhat move by Kubica reminded me of F1 2000 game where people just go straight on into the pits irrepective of who is in front (thus having a good collision)
- RagingJamaican
- F1 Rookie
- Posts: 949
- Joined: 07 Jun 2010, 14:03
- Location: Bahamas
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
Hahaha thats what i used to dosdutt wrote:Thhat move by Kubica reminded me of F1 2000 game where people just go straight on into the pits irrepective of who is in front (thus having a good collision)
Re: Grand Prix du Canada 2010
I dont understand why you say Michael deserves less? He has make a brilliant start with powerful time. After, he has pit, he has had some racing with Robert, he pitted again because of this fight, he came back on track, he has made near 40!!! laps with soft tyres, and Massa has tried a stupid move on him.Tom Vandenhove wrote:Good review, Phil. Althought I would have given Petrov a 4 and Kubica a 6. Petrov deserves more as the start accident wasn't completely his fault and Michael was far worse. (at least for his standarts) Kubica deserves less in my opninion because he drove a bit too aggresive, especially in his battle with Adrian Sutil.
So he has made an average race.
And what do you prefer : an "agressive" driver who take risk and make the show (Schumacher, Hamilton), or a gay who never take risk, never overtake and only want to score points (Massa, Rosberg)?
I wait for your answer...