JB managed to score only 7 points in the last 6 races! What an epic fail, especially after his team radio in Australia - “welcome 2009”
Great newsFerrari92 wrote:Spa extends until 2015

Great newsFerrari92 wrote:Spa extends until 2015
TBH I think Grosjean could win the Bahrain GP if he was in Raikkonen's situation. Grosjean is "crazy" but in a good way.Mar wrote:donald29 wrote:No go on, I'd like to know what you mean. Biased against Kimi?![]()
I just look at the numbers, and I simply don't see what they tell. I try to see it, but I simply don't find it.
More than biased against Kimi, they are so biased pro Romain that the thing turns silly.
Yeah, some teams go so far as to apologize their drivers for not providing them a 100 percent working car (or a good strategy or a fast pit-stop). I think I'll start paying more attention to Team Lotus' press releases...Mar wrote:I don't have many hopes about that. Temperature should be good for Lotus, but I'm sure the team will screw Räikkönen's qualifying, again. After the diff and the KERS, they still have to brake his DRS down. Of course, the DRS will already be defective in free practice, just like it happened with the diff anf the KERS.
There, there you have another example of the team bias. Permane saying yesterday how impressive Grosjean's pace had been on the hard tyres in FP3. Räikkönen had no KERS at the time, what would have been impressive is Kimi being faster given the circumstances
antyk wrote:Wtf is wrong with McLaren? They really need to improve or they can quite soon forget about the title. The constructors championship is already gone in my opinion.
JB managed to score only 7 points in the last 6 races! What an epic fail, especially after his team radio in Australia - “welcome 2009”
Great newsFerrari92 wrote:Spa extends until 2015
I agree with you about that but there is a chance that rain should come at the end of the race was in their minds when they planned their strategy.Ferrari92 wrote:mikhailv wrote:Covering a wet race that never came.Ferrari92 wrote:But why not make a long first stint ??donald29 wrote:Seems Alonso's strategy could have been based on there being rain later in the race...
15 Laps on hard tyres doesn't make sense.
Be rate though, disadvantaged themselves but still finished 3 seconds behind the leader on tyres which just went away on the ferrari. Wouldve thought they would run longer on the harder tyres both stints and try do le old splash and dash at the end. but 2nd is still fantastic when we never expected pole, top 4 i thought would be gotten through luck in the first place.
Either road, 13 points lead still, it will change between webber and vettel, ferrari need to react fast and bring more and more to the car each week.
I rather think they wanted to cover off Webber who pitted a lap earlier
Ferrariman60 wrote:
Maybe Jenson was referring to McLaren's 2009 season...
What you don't see is that Kimi is not the future for Lotus, Romain is. Kimi should be winning races if you look at what Romain is doing with the same car. Kimi should retire along with Schumacher. Too old, no b***, no risk taking. Plod along and try to finish.Mar wrote:donald29 wrote:No go on, I'd like to know what you mean. Biased against Kimi?![]()
I just look at the numbers, and I simply don't see what they tell. I try to see it, but I simply don't find it.
More than biased against Kimi, they are so biased pro Romain that the thing turns silly.
What Romain is doing with the same car? You mean crashing with drivers right and left and, in case there is nobody to crash with, just crash it all by himself?mileso wrote:What you don't see is that Kimi is not the future for Lotus, Romain is. Kimi should be winning races if you look at what Romain is doing with the same car. Kimi should retire along with Schumacher. Too old, no b***, no risk taking. Plod along and try to finish.Mar wrote:donald29 wrote:No go on, I'd like to know what you mean. Biased against Kimi?![]()
I just look at the numbers, and I simply don't see what they tell. I try to see it, but I simply don't find it.
More than biased against Kimi, they are so biased pro Romain that the thing turns silly.
Maybe I'm goofy, but you might also need to learn how to read.mileso wrote:Yes it is all clear now! Lotus is in a conspiracy to keep one of their cars from winning! Brilliant strategy.
You do understand we are comparing a driver with 16 starts to a driver with 164 starts? And for all his "crashing" is only 22 points behind Kimi?
I understand there is no arguing with die-hard Kimi followers, so I will just have to live with your goofy prejudices.
Mar wrote: I have a rant against Lotus and their biased PR, but I better shut up
So yes, as you say, I'm just a die-hard Kimi fan with goofy prejudices.Mar wrote: ...
I have always defended the guy. I think he is very fast, but I simply don't see in the timings some of the things he's supposed to be doing.