UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
a lot of people criticise Button for Malasia race. But I am not agree with them. When raining, he used to get more risk, and if this risk was the right choice, then he is awesome. But risk used to be fail.The Immortal Dragon wrote:Well, he wasn't a demon in Malaysia!skywatcher wrote:I voted for Kimi, but if rain, Jenson has a good shot, the McLarens are running well so far, and we all know he is a demon in changing conditions!
Malasia, was not a bad race for button, only one fault crashing with Narain (were fighting for position). But was not a bad race.
If rain on China, I bet for him
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
ummm, Massa out, Button to Ferrari and this is his (hamilton) new teammate?. Maybe, he may get in the car.iceman1 wrote:...
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Button was lightening fast when he came out of the pits and almost hit Lewis, such was his speed. He just misjudged the braking distance when lapping Karthikeyan. Simple mistake. The strange thing was his poor pace on the newer set of Inters. He was very slow, so maybe the set was damaged. From then on his pace was fine.dacer wrote:a lot of people criticise Button for Malasia race. But I am not agree with them. When raining, he used to get more risk, and if this risk was the right choice, then he is awesome. But risk used to be fail.The Immortal Dragon wrote:Well, he wasn't a demon in Malaysia!skywatcher wrote:I voted for Kimi, but if rain, Jenson has a good shot, the McLarens are running well so far, and we all know he is a demon in changing conditions!
Malasia, was not a bad race for button, only one fault crashing with Narain (were fighting for position). But was not a bad race.
If rain on China, I bet for him
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Where Lewis jumps into the car, he just grabs the car, puts it on like overalls and zips it closeddacer wrote:ummm, Massa out, Button to Ferrari and this is his (hamilton) new teammate?. Maybe, he may get in the car.iceman1 wrote:...
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Didn't Button pit a lap earlier than Hamilton? So had an extra lap on the tyres which is why he was faster and nearly hit him. Lewis had only just come out the pits.
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
DRS zone is 152m shorter than last season apparently. It will be 752 metres before Turn 14.iceman1 wrote:Single DRS zone for China. Detection between T12 and T13. Activation halfway down the straight.
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Lewis Hamilton will drop 5 place on the grid due to a gearbox change
- JoostLamers
- F1 Champion
- Posts: 11852
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 21:38
- Location: Tilburg
- Contact:
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Major bummer.
But now he can show what he's worth starting from 6th or lower in that car
But now he can show what he's worth starting from 6th or lower in that car
<<<The flag Lew1s waved at
- The Immortal Dragon
- GP2 Driver
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 17 Mar 2007, 21:41
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Hahah, awesome picture!iceman1 wrote:
Lewis looks like a midget next to Yao
2000 - San Marino (Friday)
2001 - San Marino (Saturday)
2003 - Italy (Sunday)
2008 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2009 - Great Britain (Friday)
2010 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2011 - Belgium (Sunday)
2012 - Germany (Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
2001 - San Marino (Saturday)
2003 - Italy (Sunday)
2008 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2009 - Great Britain (Friday)
2010 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2011 - Belgium (Sunday)
2012 - Germany (Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
- The Immortal Dragon
- GP2 Driver
- Posts: 257
- Joined: 17 Mar 2007, 21:41
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Well, he obviously made a mistake in crashing into the HRT, but surely that can happen and we forgive him for it.dacer wrote:a lot of people criticise Button for Malasia race. But I am not agree with them. When raining, he used to get more risk, and if this risk was the right choice, then he is awesome. But risk used to be fail.The Immortal Dragon wrote:Well, he wasn't a demon in Malaysia!skywatcher wrote:I voted for Kimi, but if rain, Jenson has a good shot, the McLarens are running well so far, and we all know he is a demon in changing conditions!
Malasia, was not a bad race for button, only one fault crashing with Narain (were fighting for position). But was not a bad race.
If rain on China, I bet for him
However, Senna was at some point last and finished 6th, whilst Button failed to make an impression when he dropped back.
And that's because, if you remember, he had severe issues in getting his inters up to temperature, which is obviously crucial.
It was strange, it was unusual for Button, but that's because he didn't come home with any points whatsoever.
2000 - San Marino (Friday)
2001 - San Marino (Saturday)
2003 - Italy (Sunday)
2008 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2009 - Great Britain (Friday)
2010 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2011 - Belgium (Sunday)
2012 - Germany (Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
2001 - San Marino (Saturday)
2003 - Italy (Sunday)
2008 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2009 - Great Britain (Friday)
2010 - Great Britain (Sunday)
2011 - Belgium (Sunday)
2012 - Germany (Friday, Saturday, Sunday)
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
Lotus's protest against the Mercedes double DRS system has been rejected.
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
I wonder if that's clarification enough for Christian Horner.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 09 Jul 2011, 18:25
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
The FIA statement included the following: "The Mercedes design is not activated by driver movement. It is a consequence of a change of position of the driver adjustable bodywork, which is permitted under the regulations."phil1993 wrote:Lotus's protest against the Mercedes double DRS system has been rejected.
Perhaps someone smart could explain it to me? It is not activated by driver movement, it is just activated by the DRS which is activated by driver movement Well, anyway it is good to have a decision one way or another so we can concentrate on the racing
Re: UBS Chinese Grand Prix
When the driver presses the button to activate the DRS, it does just that. It flips the wing.
As a consequence of that, it opens some holes that guide air elsewhere. So that's fine.
It would not be fine if they pressed a button that specifically opened the holes.
As a consequence of that, it opens some holes that guide air elsewhere. So that's fine.
It would not be fine if they pressed a button that specifically opened the holes.