Poll - should the 10 places penalty be eliminated?
Poll - should the 10 places penalty be eliminated?
1) i dont see how a driver should be penalized for mechanical failure [-(
2) i think this is 1 of the worst rules in F1, it kills races and championships [-(
3) its a main factor that played in the 2005 championship. kimi lost 10s of points just for this rule [-(
4) if your engine blows, put in a new 1 and lets race for pole position!!!!! that what i think 8)
5) what do u think? :-k
2) i think this is 1 of the worst rules in F1, it kills races and championships [-(
3) its a main factor that played in the 2005 championship. kimi lost 10s of points just for this rule [-(
4) if your engine blows, put in a new 1 and lets race for pole position!!!!! that what i think 8)
5) what do u think? :-k
mass insanity.. i can't believe they wont allow engine development from here on out...
i guess it can do what they want it to, to promote efficiency, but i don't see how they can make it more efficient with the current design frozen.
should the 10 places penalty be eliminated? hmm...dunno but i think yes :-#
i guess it can do what they want it to, to promote efficiency, but i don't see how they can make it more efficient with the current design frozen.
should the 10 places penalty be eliminated? hmm...dunno but i think yes :-#
Syckns wrote:LOL :-s , ofcourse he must get penalzied, if not teams would change engine every session #-o
things were just fine before this rule was introduced. if a team finds a problem in the engine it was changed. the championship was more competitive because you were almost guaranteed that engine failures will not send a title contender to the back of the grid in a significant point of the season!!
anyways, they changed the rule for this year. now, engine changes on Friday will not be subject to this rule anymore.
nelmesy16 wrote:because when a engine is a race older and another team gets a new 1, the new engine will have slightly more power then the older 1. :-k
ok but if its ok to change engines, then all teams will use new engines, and the advantage you are talking about is eliminated
what im talking about is completely eliminating the 1 engine/ 2 races rule.
the only reason it was introduced was to reduce cost, same as the new engine development freeze
if the 2 race per 1 engine rule stays, but the penalty is dropped, then yes, i agree with you completely
- Super Aguri
- F1 Rookie
- Posts: 883
- Joined: 31 Dec 2006, 15:56
- Location: Scotland
- Contact:
jana7i wrote:if the 2 race per 1 engine rule stays, but the penalty is dropped, then yes, i agree with you completelynelmesy16 wrote:because when a engine is a race older and another team gets a new 1, the new engine will have slightly more power then the older 1. :-k
i agree with what u said there!
- Dark_Fisico
- F1 Rookie
- Posts: 654
- Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 08:26
- Contact: