2008 FORMULA 1 Belgian Grand Prix

[phil1993]

Kimi double blocked didn't he?

At turn 1 or the chicane?

the main straight

imagine this : $40 million driver supporting a $10million driver to win a championship

you don't have to imagine it...

[maltafan]

Kimi crashed. Lewis wouldve won anyway! no-one is seeing my point!!!!!!!!! if kimi finsihed p2 then maybe, but he didnt HE CRASHED OUT!!!!!!

I agree with you, but even if he didn't crash, it was a legitimate overtake in my opinion

[shailf1]

well if massa had pit for inters then he would have won the race.

[Stoegi]

I would have laughed hard if Rosberg had taken both Kimi and Lewis out.

[phil1993]

he nearly did - did you see how close Kimi got!!!

[Stoegi]

Yep...that was close:D

[scermat]

i dont think lewis let kimi go completely after the last chicane.

erm. it was fine if lewis was 4 seconds behind before the chichane, but really he was right up with his diffuser anyway. kimi also ran into lewis at la source.

rain came... kimi went.

[Ali]

Kimi crashed. Lewis wouldve won anyway! no-one is seeing my point!!!!!!!!! if kimi finsihed p2 then maybe, but he didnt HE CRASHED OUT!!!!!!

There is not a "conditionally law" concept mate. If someone breakes the rule and tries to kill someone, then he's got punished, without further considering whether man is dead or not.

But in this time, I don't know whether Lewis did gain any advantage. The only advantage we think that Lewis put his car into the slipstream of Kimi's car in the way he wanted. So that may be a problem.

[phil1993]

At least Ferrari had no engine problems....

[iceman1]

Ron dennis :

"First of all we don't know what the investigation is about. One assumes it was the incident between Kimi and Lewis at the chicane. First of all, Lewis was ahead at the chicane and he got pushed wide. He definitely was in the lead coming out of the chicane, we immediately radioed him to let Kimi past. We let Kimi past and then overtook him again before the line.

Inevitably, we wanted to know whether we had actually, that was deemed to be a correction of that, and we checked with Charlie [Whiting, Race Director], of course Charlie can only give an opinion, he's not the stewards, but he gave an opinion that we had complied properly to the regulations. I would even dispute that there was any fault because we had the corner in the chicane, but even if we didn't have the corner we let Kimi back in the lead."

[scermat]

Kimi crashed. Lewis wouldve won anyway! no-one is seeing my point!!!!!!!!! if kimi finsihed p2 then maybe, but he didnt HE CRASHED OUT!!!!!!

I agree with you, but even if he didn't crash, it was a legitimate overtake in my opinion

i disagre. breaking the rules should be penalised in any case. but lewis didnt break any rules there.

At least Ferrari had no engine problems....

haha true. but its not like anyone used any engine in the last 2 laps

[raikkonen4ever]

Aaarrrrgghhhh!!!
FIA should shortened the laps again!!

[ScuderiaFan]

glad to see massa 2nd but sad to kimi out at last .. don't why the luck isn't with the scuderia at the end of each race :(

[phil1993]

Kimi crashed. Lewis wouldve won anyway! no-one is seeing my point!!!!!!!!! if kimi finsihed p2 then maybe, but he didnt HE CRASHED OUT!!!!!!

There is not a "conditionally law" concept mate. If someone breakes the rule and tries to kill someone, then he's got punished, without further considering whether man is dead or not.

But in this time, I don't know whether Lewis did gain any advantage. The only advantage we think that Lewis put his car into the slipstream of Kimi's car in the way he wanted. So that may be a problem.

what you're comparing is a bit strange mate. i see your point but i think its a bit extreme!

true - lewis did, but he wasn't expecting kimi to be so slow into la source i dont think

[Ali]

At least Ferrari had no engine problems....

And both cars will use a new engine for Monza.