2013 Formula One Discussion

This forum gives you a chance to be able to communicate with your fellow F1 fans.
Locked
User avatar
Edi96
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:13
Location: Hannover

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by Edi96 » 13 Feb 2013, 19:43

phil1993 wrote:Glock wasn't deemed good enough for Toyota after 2009 - they didn't want to retain him even before they pulled the plug
That's not true. Toyota decided not to take up the option on his contract when the intends of the parent company to pull the plug at the end of the season became clear. It had nothing to do with his performance.

User avatar
phil1993
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 25503
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 17:32
Contact:

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by phil1993 » 13 Feb 2013, 19:55

Edi96 wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Glock wasn't deemed good enough for Toyota after 2009 - they didn't want to retain him even before they pulled the plug
That's not true. Toyota decided not to take up the option on his contract when the intends of the parent company to pull the plug at the end of the season became clear. It had nothing to do with his performance.
Autosport believe otherwise...

User avatar
kals
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 533
Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 14:41

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by kals » 13 Feb 2013, 22:32

And you believe Autosport?

User avatar
Edi96
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:13
Location: Hannover

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by Edi96 » 13 Feb 2013, 22:40

phil1993 wrote:
Edi96 wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Glock wasn't deemed good enough for Toyota after 2009 - they didn't want to retain him even before they pulled the plug
That's not true. Toyota decided not to take up the option on his contract when the intends of the parent company to pull the plug at the end of the season became clear. It had nothing to do with his performance.
Autosport believe otherwise...
They are wrong. auto motor und sport reported in May 2009 that Toyota has already decided to pull out of F1. Trulli had no contract for 2010 and the team wanted to replace him (maybe with Kobayashi?) but they wanted to retain Glock (according to John Howett in August 2009). The team was still hoping that Toyota would change their decision, therefore they put everything about contracts on hold. They told Glock that they would not take up the option when the situation became hopeless (September 2009).
Last edited by Edi96 on 13 Feb 2013, 22:42, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by mikhailv » 13 Feb 2013, 22:41

I thought they were going for Glock/Kobayashi. I know they were disillusioned with Trulli and vice versa; cant say I blame Trulli; Toyota threw so much money away for zero.

User avatar
kals
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 533
Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 14:41

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by kals » 13 Feb 2013, 22:53

Toyota threw more money at Ralf Schumacher and what did he deliver? Trulli was only brought to the team because of Mike Gascoyne.

Glock was important to Toyota, who needed a German driver to fulfill their desired obligations in the German marketspace.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by mikhailv » 13 Feb 2013, 23:37

kals wrote:Toyota threw more money at Ralf Schumacher and what did he deliver? Trulli was only brought to the team because of Mike Gascoyne.

Glock was important to Toyota, who needed a German driver to fulfill their desired obligations in the German marketspace.

Problem toyota had was that Trulli was the best drive Toyota had. he got results most.

But i think partially Toyota left because Honda left.

User avatar
Edi96
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:13
Location: Hannover

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by Edi96 » 14 Feb 2013, 00:08

kals wrote:Toyota threw more money at Ralf Schumacher and what did he deliver? Trulli was only brought to the team because of Mike Gascoyne.

Glock was important to Toyota, who needed a German driver to fulfill their desired obligations in the German marketspace.
Toyata did not need a German driver. Germany is not and never will be a perfect market for Toyota as we have enough own car companies. Glock was the best driver available (GP2 Champion) after Ralf's perfomance got worse and worse. Honestly, Ralf Schumacher was an incredible waste of money.

User avatar
kals
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 533
Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 14:41

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by kals » 14 Feb 2013, 04:14

I agree, Ralf was a waste of money. But Germany was important for Toyota. Germany may have not needed Toyota, but Toyota saw a major market opportunity in Germany. Hence they set up in Germany and hired German.

User avatar
Edi96
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:13
Location: Hannover

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by Edi96 » 14 Feb 2013, 09:07

Toyota Motorsport is based in Cologne, Germany since 1979. Moreover, they spent their first three seasons without a German driver. Afterwards they hired Ralf because he was a multiple Grand Prix winner and out of contract for 2005. When Ralf disappointed, the current GP2 champion was the best driver available. There was no board decision due to which Toyota must have a German driver. They only supported Japanese drivers like Nakajima.

User avatar
kals
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 533
Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 14:41

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by kals » 14 Feb 2013, 13:28

The main reason why they spent the first three seasons without a German driver was the leading drivers were contracted elsewhere... Ralf with Williams and Michael with Ferrari. Heidfeld was still a growing driver, was under contract with Sauber and wasn't in a position to lead a team.

As soon as Ralf became available Toyota snapped him up.

User avatar
Edi96
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2008, 16:13
Location: Hannover

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by Edi96 » 14 Feb 2013, 14:08

They could have signed Frentzen after he had to leave Jordan and Heidfeld was available in 2004. Sorry, you are just wrong in this case.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by mikhailv » 14 Feb 2013, 14:13


User avatar
kals
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 533
Joined: 13 Feb 2013, 14:41

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by kals » 14 Feb 2013, 14:17

Frentzen retired at the end of 2003 and when he was fired by Jordan in 2001 Toyota were still building the team with Salo and McNish doing all the development work. Considering their pace in all the tests they did throughout 2001 they were not an attractive proposition for many drivers. McNish and Salo were originally signed for 2001 and 2002 seasons, but were fired after the first year. Panis and Da Matta were contracted through to the end of 2004.

I've been trying to find information to back up my understanding, this is all I can find - http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/28/sport ... d3__4.html. The article explains how important the German market was to F1 back in the early mid-2000's but it doesn't explicitly imply anything about Toyota wanting German drivers.

So, after all these years I may well be wrong.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: 2013 Formula One Discussion

Post by mikhailv » 14 Feb 2013, 15:14

kals wrote:Frentzen retired at the end of 2003 and when he was fired by Jordan in 2001 Toyota were still building the team with Salo and McNish doing all the development work. Considering their pace in all the tests they did throughout 2001 they were not an attractive proposition for many drivers. McNish and Salo were originally signed for 2001 and 2002 seasons, but were fired after the first year. Panis and Da Matta were contracted through to the end of 2004.

I've been trying to find information to back up my understanding, this is all I can find - http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/28/sport ... d3__4.html. The article explains how important the German market was to F1 back in the early mid-2000's but it doesn't explicitly imply anything about Toyota wanting German drivers.

So, after all these years I may well be wrong.
I thought Frentzen didnt want to goto toyota, so left. Thats why they took Mcnish and Salo for 02 in which both were not resigned after year 1, signed Panis in 03 and signed Da matta who was a winner in champcar with toyota, they stayed in 2004 only for test driver Zonta to replace Da matta who was then replaced by Trulli after his falling out with Briatore.

Panis retired and Ralf was picked up hence Trulli/Ralf were the main drivers, with Zonta replacing ralf when he was ill at the USGP of 2005. He was replaced at the end of 07 because of his poor performances, and the fact he was paid more than every driver bar Raikkonen in 2007.But I always thought they saw Germany as a key market.

Locked