i usually don't barge into profound discussions like this because i don't think i could cope them
but all i can say things are waaaay more complicated as articles always speak the half truth.
for instance take this article pointed some pages ago
http://www.f1i.com/features.php?id=6909
2 or thre years ago when i first read it i completely believed it. NOW, i can't really say the same. read the hole thing, compare them with the 2009 situation and thinghs somehow don't match. monte seemed the guy who wanted kimi most but we all know what a bastard he was in 2009. on the other hand todt didn't seem to want kimi that much but we all know again how he stood up for him. Finally, if monte was so much into top drivers more than sponsors, why the hell he kept massa and agreed on alonso's/santander demands?
I'm pointing this out to illustrate that truth is always somewhere in the middle and lots of importatnt things are kept away form the public. Bottom line, we just have to be patient once more. and again.
what are we doing here is pure speculation which sometimes is not that healthy for our heart, right?