Everyone always uses this against Fernando... "he had the best car so he doesn't deserve the championship"nelmesy16 wrote:sorry m8! i think he is over raited! he only won the championship coz he had the best car that he could get! plus he had some luck with shumi having a bad season!jana7i wrote:ALONSO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-s:-s :-s :-snelmesy16 wrote:coultard
alonso
webber
kova
ralf
Well what about Michael Schumacher, most of his titles were won in the best car, what about Senna, he was in the unbeatable, dominating McLaren...I could go on all day...it is always necessary to have the best car to win...but Fernando didn't move to another team to get a better car (like Kimi did) he stayed at Renault, patiently, Renault were not championship winners since they took over benetton...what I'm saying is that it's not like Fernando did what Kimi did: he saw that Ferrari was the fastest car and went there because of the car...
Anyway for both 2005 and 2006 Renault did not have the fastest car for the 2nd half of the season...but it was reliable and Fernando made little mistakes...from 2005 and 2006, I can only remember Montreal 2005 where Fernando made a result-effecting mistake... compare this to his rivals...Kimi: Nurburgring 05, Budapest 06, Montreal 06... Michael: Melbourne 06, Budapest 06, (also let's not forget his dirty cheating tactics in Budapest 06 and Monaco 06 (that GP and also the dirty Bridgestone who didn't want Michelins to race at Indy 05 not even for the fans...)
Schumi having a bad season...? well that means he was a worse driver than Fernando that year...that means Fernando deserved it... you contradict yourself :P