Team Orders

This forum gives you a chance to be able to communicate with your fellow F1 fans.
User avatar
donald29
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4007
Joined: 25 May 2007, 17:52
Location: Kent

Re: Team Orders

Post by donald29 » 30 Mar 2013, 12:54

phil1993 wrote:
tderias wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Everyone's missing the main point here.

Irrespective of the Vettel-Webber issue, the more important fact is that Vettel has undermined Horner.

Team principals don't hold Horner with huge respect. Part of that is the dominance, part of that is because he's in Bernie's pocket, but part of that is because he is weak. This latest issue undermines him further and weakens Red Bull's position in political discussions.
Gotta disagree on that being the main point. The main point is what Sebastian has done and how that has affected the F1 community's perspective towards him. With Horner, Marko, and Mateschitz in the picture, it was always vague who's really in charge. And then we hear Seb saying 'Mark is too slow, get him outta the way', and you get the feeling that he's running the RB show...
The F1 community's perspective on Vettel won't change too much. A lot already rate Alonso and Hamilton as superior. This merely adds to their ammunition.

It has hugely weakened Horner's position. He is not in charge. Who is?
Can't remember who said it, but someone made the point that this is a problem of the team principal being an employee. Horner is basically just working for Mateschitz back in Austria.

Horner was so weak that race. When he said 'this is silly Seb, come on' he sounded like a supply teacher with no control of the class. Compare with how Brawn slapped down Rosberg. Horner should have said clearly and forcefully 'do not pass Mark'. Just saying 'this is silly', Vettel could turn around and say (like he did) I didn't realise he didn't want me to pass. If he said 'do not pass' Vettel would have no excuse.

User avatar
mnmracer
kart driver
kart driver
Posts: 89
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 14:46

Re: Team Orders

Post by mnmracer » 30 Mar 2013, 15:11

mikhailv wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Ah, Roebuck has spoken. Therefore it is the gospel.

Anyway, that particular order was 'maintain the gap, which he evidently ignored.
Ah. Phil has spoken. Therefore its gospel :roll::

You can easily see he backs out of it. He stays behind Vettel. Showing he could have him but is letting him have this one under team orders. Vettel should've made the point as well in Malaysia.
A completely moot argument considering the order was to maintain the gap, not to 'not overtake'.
"No your honor, I should not be convicted for burglary, because although I stole their stuff, I could have killed that family in their sleep and I didn't."
Would be interesting to see.

But so you are basically calling Mark a liar, who said himself in the post-race conference AND in his own BBC column that he was ignoring the teamorders and fighting 'till the end.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: Team Orders

Post by mikhailv » 30 Mar 2013, 17:02

mnmracer wrote:
mikhailv wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Ah, Roebuck has spoken. Therefore it is the gospel.

Anyway, that particular order was 'maintain the gap, which he evidently ignored.
Ah. Phil has spoken. Therefore its gospel :roll::

You can easily see he backs out of it. He stays behind Vettel. Showing he could have him but is letting him have this one under team orders. Vettel should've made the point as well in Malaysia.
A completely moot argument considering the order was to maintain the gap, not to 'not overtake'.
"No your honor, I should not be convicted for burglary, because although I stole their stuff, I could have killed that family in their sleep and I didn't."
Would be interesting to see.

But so you are basically calling Mark a liar, who said himself in the post-race conference AND in his own BBC column that he was ignoring the teamorders and fighting 'till the end.
1) bulls** example you are using. Webber was flexing his speed which he had and could easily overtake Vettel
2) Webber was clearly saving face. Its not the first time.
3) Webber did maintain the gap. All he did was show how easy he couldve swallowed vettel.

Not that it Matters. And its not a moot point. Webber couldve easily done what Vettel did and overtake for the win. He didn't. Instead he showed he could do and that Vettel was at his mercy. Something Vettel should've done. Either way. Roebuck has much more credibility than yourself, and he isn't the first person to say Webber honored team orders by not being a d**k and overtaking Vettel; just showing him he was at his mercy.

If you cant see how easy Webber wouldve overtook Vettel, then your blind.

User avatar
mnmracer
kart driver
kart driver
Posts: 89
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 14:46

Re: Team Orders

Post by mnmracer » 30 Mar 2013, 18:03

FACT: the gap was 4 seconds at the time of the order.
FACT: Mark Webber spent three laps, closer than 1 second to Vettel.

But you are also evading a question you were asked.
Are you calling Mark Webber a liar for (multiple times) proudly telling the world that he ignored teamorders?

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: Team Orders

Post by mikhailv » 30 Mar 2013, 19:11

mnmracer wrote:FACT: the gap was 4 seconds at the time of the order.
FACT: Mark Webber spent three laps, closer than 1 second to Vettel.

But you are also evading a question you were asked.
Are you calling Mark Webber a liar for (multiple times) proudly telling the world that he ignored teamorders?
Oh. that it? Keep the 4 second gap, he was told. Why was this? To stop Webber overtaking Vettel even though he was faster. Webber didn't keep a gap. He went and showed everyone he could overtake but was being told not to. Webber still obeyed the team order of not overtaking Vettel. That's the point. Webber was told to keep the gap so he wouldn't overtake Vettel, as Vettels prior radio insinuated that the team should 'be wise' because he would take himself and Webber out the race. Keep the gap to not overtake Vettel. Webber kept a gap. Not the 4 seconds, but he still kept a gap, still stayed in second, still did the job for the team, and obeyed the intended instruction behind 'keep the gap'.

Not avoiding anything, I already insinuated Webber lied, but if you want me to point blank say it; Mark Webber Lied to save face at the British grand prix in 2011. Done it before, will do it again. Lest we forget, he surrendered his wing that race to Vettel. He has continually said he is equal to Vettel. So in return, do you believe Webber when he says he is equal? or do you think, like he said in Silverstone 2011; He was saving face?

Massa said Germany 2010 wasn't team orders. We all knew it was. but it was illegal to admit. but he still lied to try saving face. Alonso did aswell; said he didn't need Massa to move over. To save face.

User avatar
mnmracer
kart driver
kart driver
Posts: 89
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 14:46

Re: Team Orders

Post by mnmracer » 30 Mar 2013, 19:39

mikhailv wrote:Oh. that it? Keep the 4 second gap, he was told. Why was this? To stop Webber overtaking Vettel even though he was faster. Webber didn't keep a gap. He went and showed everyone he could overtake but was being told not to. Webber still obeyed the team order of not overtaking Vettel. That's the point. Webber was told to keep the gap so he wouldn't overtake Vettel, as Vettels prior radio insinuated that the team should 'be wise' because he would take himself and Webber out the race. Keep the gap to not overtake Vettel. Webber kept a gap. Not the 4 seconds, but he still kept a gap, still stayed in second, still did the job for the team, and obeyed the intended instruction behind 'keep the gap'.
Wow, you are desperate aren't you.
Can you at least have the decency to admit you have nothing factual to back-up your claim?

User avatar
iceman1
F1 Legend
F1 Legend
Posts: 23702
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 15:50
Location: North Pole
Contact:

Re: Team Orders

Post by iceman1 » 05 Apr 2013, 09:48

So it's not only Mercedes. But according to AMuS Webber had fuel problems as well!

http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/form ... 91460.html

User avatar
Vlad-SRB
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 531
Joined: 02 Dec 2012, 23:06

Re: Team Orders

Post by Vlad-SRB » 05 Apr 2013, 11:23

It is a logical thing, considering how much he pushed in the middle of the race, when Vettel pulled back and saved it.
Image

Human at Sight,
Monster at Heart!

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: Team Orders

Post by mikhailv » 05 Apr 2013, 13:24

I think it highlights a problem that teams are underfuelling as well. So its not that the tyres go off so quick, its also that teams aren't fuelling cars to be pushed to the edge because tyres go off and teams dont want the weight of the fuel penalizing the car.

So on that, there should be a minimum litre/kilo of fuel limit introduced and then its ALL about managing tyres, NOT because your trying to get by on fumes. Teams clearly have the fuel tank capacity and as such, should be utilised correctly.

User avatar
phil1993
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 25503
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 17:32
Contact:

Re: Team Orders

Post by phil1993 » 05 Apr 2013, 13:52

Teams have always underfuelled, it's nothing new. But occasionally teams misjudge it; Mercedes admitted they expected the rain to last and the safety car to intervene. It did not, so fuel consumption was higher than anticipated.

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: Team Orders

Post by mikhailv » 05 Apr 2013, 17:22

I know they under fuel, but not to the point of the detriment we are getting now. Refuelling for example, it never happened because fuel usage was factored in for how long you could max-attack for.

The point where its detrimental to severely dropping pace is ridiculous.

LotusF1
car driver
car driver
Posts: 9
Joined: 24 Apr 2013, 00:01

Re: Team Orders

Post by LotusF1 » 25 Apr 2013, 11:34

François wrote:Team orders are and have been a part of F1 for eons, but are they necessary? Having followed MotoGP for a few years, I very much doubt it. The very thought of team orders in MotoGP is laughable, and as a result, some great intra-team rivalries build up and (for the most part) get settled on the track. Much unlike F1 team bosses, MotoGP chiefs aren't under the delusion that they can babysit their riders any longer once the red lights go out. Imagine trying to implement a multi 21 with Rossi and Lorenzo....
I have to admit, it's pretty exciting watching team mates in MotoGP go at each other without restraint.

User avatar
François
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 1479
Joined: 05 Sep 2009, 18:39

Re: Team Orders

Post by François » 25 Apr 2013, 11:36

Did you join the boards just to keep agreeing with me? :p

I think I like you!
Image

LotusF1
car driver
car driver
Posts: 9
Joined: 24 Apr 2013, 00:01

Re: Team Orders

Post by LotusF1 » 25 Apr 2013, 15:52

donald29 wrote:
phil1993 wrote:
tderias wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Everyone's missing the main point here.

Irrespective of the Vettel-Webber issue, the more important fact is that Vettel has undermined Horner.

Team principals don't hold Horner with huge respect. Part of that is the dominance, part of that is because he's in Bernie's pocket, but part of that is because he is weak. This latest issue undermines him further and weakens Red Bull's position in political discussions.
Gotta disagree on that being the main point. The main point is what Sebastian has done and how that has affected the F1 community's perspective towards him. With Horner, Marko, and Mateschitz in the picture, it was always vague who's really in charge. And then we hear Seb saying 'Mark is too slow, get him outta the way', and you get the feeling that he's running the RB show...
The F1 community's perspective on Vettel won't change too much. A lot already rate Alonso and Hamilton as superior. This merely adds to their ammunition.

It has hugely weakened Horner's position. He is not in charge. Who is?
Can't remember who said it, but someone made the point that this is a problem of the team principal being an employee. Horner is basically just working for Mateschitz back in Austria.

Horner was so weak that race. When he said 'this is silly Seb, come on' he sounded like a supply teacher with no control of the class. Compare with how Brawn slapped down Rosberg. Horner should have said clearly and forcefully 'do not pass Mark'. Just saying 'this is silly', .
I wonder in retrospect how forceful Senna and Prost's team boss was. I know whatever he told them fell on deaf ears apparently....

User avatar
mikhailv
F1 Routinier
F1 Routinier
Posts: 4110
Joined: 31 Mar 2008, 15:27
Location: Mansfield, Nottinghamshire

Re: Team Orders

Post by mikhailv » 28 Apr 2013, 13:36

LotusF1 wrote:
donald29 wrote:
phil1993 wrote:
tderias wrote:
phil1993 wrote:Everyone's missing the main point here.

Irrespective of the Vettel-Webber issue, the more important fact is that Vettel has undermined Horner.

Team principals don't hold Horner with huge respect. Part of that is the dominance, part of that is because he's in Bernie's pocket, but part of that is because he is weak. This latest issue undermines him further and weakens Red Bull's position in political discussions.
Gotta disagree on that being the main point. The main point is what Sebastian has done and how that has affected the F1 community's perspective towards him. With Horner, Marko, and Mateschitz in the picture, it was always vague who's really in charge. And then we hear Seb saying 'Mark is too slow, get him outta the way', and you get the feeling that he's running the RB show...
The F1 community's perspective on Vettel won't change too much. A lot already rate Alonso and Hamilton as superior. This merely adds to their ammunition.

It has hugely weakened Horner's position. He is not in charge. Who is?
Can't remember who said it, but someone made the point that this is a problem of the team principal being an employee. Horner is basically just working for Mateschitz back in Austria.

Horner was so weak that race. When he said 'this is silly Seb, come on' he sounded like a supply teacher with no control of the class. Compare with how Brawn slapped down Rosberg. Horner should have said clearly and forcefully 'do not pass Mark'. Just saying 'this is silly', .
I wonder in retrospect how forceful Senna and Prost's team boss was. I know whatever he told them fell on deaf ears apparently....
Well Dennis managed to lose both drivers, along with Alonso, Hamiltons, Montoya, Raikkonen.......... So it says alot.

Post Reply