the 5 over-rated drivers in 2007 line up
A good driver is not one who is just capable to drive a good car and winning races, but he has to be a developer of the car too. MS did not have a great car when he arrived at Ferrari, but with his imput and feedback, they managed to do one.nelmesy16 wrote:i agree with xiaopro's 5! i think coultard is too old and i think he should retire! but i dont think button is over-raited tho! if u put him in a car like a mclaren or a ferrari he would be racing up front and winning races!
I agree with you. There are lots of fast drivers around F1. But a good F1 driver is made by speed, consistency, feedback (he has to be a developer of the car) and luck (to be in the right place in the right time)! :-kmaltafan wrote:A good driver is not one who is just capable to drive a good car and winning races, but he has to be a developer of the car too. MS did not have a great car when he arrived at Ferrari, but with his imput and feedback, they managed to do one.nelmesy16 wrote:i agree with xiaopro's 5! i think coultard is too old and i think he should retire! but i dont think button is over-raited tho! if u put him in a car like a mclaren or a ferrari he would be racing up front and winning races!
well u can have all that, but, if u dont have money, then ur going no-where. so if schumi was at menardi back in the days, then they still will be at the bottom, cuz "u gosta have cash, man"!!!Gutobr wrote:I agree with you. There are lots of fast drivers around F1. But a good F1 driver is made by speed, consistency, feedback (he has to be a developer of the car) and luck (to be in the right place in the right time)! :-kmaltafan wrote:A good driver is not one who is just capable to drive a good car and winning races, but he has to be a developer of the car too. MS did not have a great car when he arrived at Ferrari, but with his imput and feedback, they managed to do one.nelmesy16 wrote:i agree with xiaopro's 5! i think coultard is too old and i think he should retire! but i dont think button is over-raited tho! if u put him in a car like a mclaren or a ferrari he would be racing up front and winning races!
What's so wrong with Minardi's. They gave Alonso's his first F1 drive.jana7i wrote:well u can have all that, but, if u dont have money, then ur going no-where. so if schumi was at menardi back in the days, then they still will be at the bottom, cuz "u gosta have cash, man"!!!Gutobr wrote:I agree with you. There are lots of fast drivers around F1. But a good F1 driver is made by speed, consistency, feedback (he has to be a developer of the car) and luck (to be in the right place in the right time)! :-kmaltafan wrote:A good driver is not one who is just capable to drive a good car and winning races, but he has to be a developer of the car too. MS did not have a great car when he arrived at Ferrari, but with his imput and feedback, they managed to do one.nelmesy16 wrote:i agree with xiaopro's 5! i think coultard is too old and i think he should retire! but i dont think button is over-raited tho! if u put him in a car like a mclaren or a ferrari he would be racing up front and winning races!
I'm sure lots of other young drivers also talked to Ron!Gutobr wrote:Yep, money is very important... but if you've noticed Hamilton was the richiest guy all over the world when arrived motorsports rs,rs , the guy WAS IN THE RIGHT PLACE IN THE RIGHT TIME WHEN MET RON DENNIS: HE WAS EXTREMELY LUCK, then luck is so important as money! [-(
mm tofu
alex wrote:I'm sure lots of other young drivers also talked to Ron!Gutobr wrote:Yep, money is very important... but if you've noticed Hamilton was the richiest guy all over the world when arrived motorsports rs,rs , the guy WAS IN THE RIGHT PLACE IN THE RIGHT TIME WHEN MET RON DENNIS: HE WAS EXTREMELY LUCK, then luck is so important as money! [-(
Yep, for sure! Then he is a lucky guy! Since Ron didn't know how good Hamilton was.
- 996 GT1 Lover
- car driver
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 16:15
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
yes ron could of putten hamilton as a test driver this year! *luckily he didnt* now hamilton can race for podiums every race and this must be pressuring alonso a hell of alot coz this young guy has come in and has been challenging the champion! if hamilton beats alonso this year then i think ron would be a bit shoked as he could of putten hamilton is last year!
maltafan wrote:What's so wrong with Minardi's. They gave Alonso's his first F1 drive.jana7i wrote:well u can have all that, but, if u dont have money, then ur going no-where. so if schumi was at menardi back in the days, then they still will be at the bottom, cuz "u gosta have cash, man"!!!Gutobr wrote:I agree with you. There are lots of fast drivers around F1. But a good F1 driver is made by speed, consistency, feedback (he has to be a developer of the car) and luck (to be in the right place in the right time)! :-kmaltafan wrote:A good driver is not one who is just capable to drive a good car and winning races, but he has to be a developer of the car too. MS did not have a great car when he arrived at Ferrari, but with his imput and feedback, they managed to do one.nelmesy16 wrote:i agree with xiaopro's 5! i think coultard is too old and i think he should retire! but i dont think button is over-raited tho! if u put him in a car like a mclaren or a ferrari he would be racing up front and winning races!
the Question is: WHERE IS MINARDI!!!!!!!?????? they ran out of money, so they dont exsits anymore.
and STR is STR, not Minardi.
Last edited by jana7i on 05 Apr 2007, 08:35, edited 2 times in total.
sooooo, he was lucky to arraive at Mclaren where ALL THE MONEY IS.Gutobr wrote:Yep, money is very important... but if you've noticed Hamilton was the richiest guy all over the world when arrived motorsports rs,rs , the guy WAS IN THE RIGHT PLACE IN THE RIGHT TIME WHEN MET RON DENNIS: HE WAS EXTREMELY LUCK, then luck is so important as money! [-(