Poll - should the 10 places penalty be eliminated?

This forum gives you a chance to be able to communicate with your fellow F1 fans.

Should a driver go back 10 places for an engine change?

yes, he should go back 10 places
8
67%
no, he should replace the engine and qualify normally
4
33%
 
Total votes: 12

User avatar
jana7i
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 316
Joined: 28 Feb 2007, 04:58
Location: Bahrain

Poll - should the 10 places penalty be eliminated?

Post by jana7i » 09 Mar 2007, 13:20

1) i dont see how a driver should be penalized for mechanical failure [-(

2) i think this is 1 of the worst rules in F1, it kills races and championships [-(

3) its a main factor that played in the 2005 championship. kimi lost 10s of points just for this rule [-(

4) if your engine blows, put in a new 1 and lets race for pole position!!!!! that what i think 8)

5) what do u think? :-k
Image

User avatar
nelmesy16
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2002
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 13:34
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

Post by nelmesy16 » 09 Mar 2007, 14:07

i think this! if your engine blows, put in a new 1 and lets race for pole position!!!!!
Image

User avatar
iceman1
F1 Legend
F1 Legend
Posts: 23702
Joined: 16 Sep 2006, 15:50
Location: North Pole
Contact:

Post by iceman1 » 09 Mar 2007, 15:01

mass insanity.. i can't believe they wont allow engine development from here on out...

i guess it can do what they want it to, to promote efficiency, but i don't see how they can make it more efficient with the current design frozen.
should the 10 places penalty be eliminated? hmm...dunno but i think yes :-#

User avatar
maltafan
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2360
Joined: 26 Dec 2006, 14:05
Location: Malta
Contact:

Post by maltafan » 09 Mar 2007, 19:29

10 places on the grid is a bit too much for drivers. I would give a penalty to the team (maybe 5 points) and no penalty to the driver.
Image

User avatar
Syckns
Kart Champion
Kart Champion
Posts: 140
Joined: 08 Mar 2007, 20:56

Post by Syckns » 09 Mar 2007, 20:03

LOL :-s , ofcourse he must get penalzied, if not teams would change engine every session #-o

User avatar
jana7i
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 316
Joined: 28 Feb 2007, 04:58
Location: Bahrain

Post by jana7i » 10 Mar 2007, 06:05

Syckns wrote:LOL :-s , ofcourse he must get penalzied, if not teams would change engine every session #-o



things were just fine before this rule was introduced. if a team finds a problem in the engine it was changed. the championship was more competitive because you were almost guaranteed that engine failures will not send a title contender to the back of the grid in a significant point of the season!!
anyways, they changed the rule for this year. now, engine changes on Friday will not be subject to this rule anymore.
Image

User avatar
nelmesy16
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2002
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 13:34
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

Post by nelmesy16 » 10 Mar 2007, 10:01

im fwaling 50/50 on both coz if u wouldnt get penalized every team would be changing engines! but we all want to see some awesome racing and if a top runner has an engine problem then he will go back 10 postions!
Image

User avatar
jana7i
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 316
Joined: 28 Feb 2007, 04:58
Location: Bahrain

Post by jana7i » 10 Mar 2007, 12:35

nelmesy16 wrote:im fwaling 50/50 on both coz if u wouldnt get penalized every team would be changing engines! but we all want to see some awesome racing and if a top runner has an engine problem then he will go back 10 postions!


why do u have a problem with teams changing engines?
Image

User avatar
nelmesy16
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2002
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 13:34
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

Post by nelmesy16 » 10 Mar 2007, 13:34

because when a engine is a race older and another team gets a new 1, the new engine will have slightly more power then the older 1. :-k
Image

User avatar
jana7i
GP2 Driver
GP2 Driver
Posts: 316
Joined: 28 Feb 2007, 04:58
Location: Bahrain

Post by jana7i » 10 Mar 2007, 16:29

nelmesy16 wrote:because when a engine is a race older and another team gets a new 1, the new engine will have slightly more power then the older 1. :-k



ok but if its ok to change engines, then all teams will use new engines, and the advantage you are talking about is eliminated

what im talking about is completely eliminating the 1 engine/ 2 races rule.
the only reason it was introduced was to reduce cost, same as the new engine development freeze

if the 2 race per 1 engine rule stays, but the penalty is dropped, then yes, i agree with you completely
Image

User avatar
Super Aguri
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 883
Joined: 31 Dec 2006, 15:56
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Post by Super Aguri » 10 Mar 2007, 16:32

If the engines were constantly changing think of the financial and just complete strain it would put on a team like Spyker.

Hmmm. I've got mixed views.
Image

User avatar
nelmesy16
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2002
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 13:34
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

Post by nelmesy16 » 11 Mar 2007, 02:23

jana7i wrote:
nelmesy16 wrote:because when a engine is a race older and another team gets a new 1, the new engine will have slightly more power then the older 1. :-k


if the 2 race per 1 engine rule stays, but the penalty is dropped, then yes, i agree with you completely



i agree with what u said there!
Image

User avatar
Dark_Fisico
F1 Rookie
F1 Rookie
Posts: 654
Joined: 17 Feb 2007, 08:26
Contact:

Post by Dark_Fisico » 13 Mar 2007, 14:23

I think the penalty is fair, not too sure why... Possibly because the teams would keep changing the engines and as Super Aguri said it costs so much to do that... I think the penalty is there to stop the teams from over spending even more then they already do...

User avatar
maltafan
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2360
Joined: 26 Dec 2006, 14:05
Location: Malta
Contact:

Post by maltafan » 13 Mar 2007, 18:23

But why penalising the diriver for something which most probably is not his mistake? Anyways. 10 places is tooo far behind, I think.
Image

User avatar
nelmesy16
F1 Driver
F1 Driver
Posts: 2002
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 13:34
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Contact:

Post by nelmesy16 » 14 Mar 2007, 03:42

im not sure if use all remember! but in 2006 albers had 3 engine failures in a row in the practise sessions! 1 in hokenhien, hungry and turkey! i couldnt believe it happened 3 times in a row and to bad in turkey he qualified 15th but had to go to the back!
Image

Post Reply