Great idea!!iceman1 wrote:i am having some connection problems , Time for Tea
A glass of Coca Cola please
Great idea!!iceman1 wrote:i am having some connection problems , Time for Tea
So what you're trying to tell me Mac are now ahead? If it's a dry race and the Ferraris waltz away, you'll swear blind that the Ferrari is the better car.. So which is it? Mac or Ferrari?joostlamers wrote:@ TA
Massa did more laps on the softer tyre AND he did more laps when it was dry...
we'll see, we'll see...TwistedArmco wrote:So what you're trying to tell me Mac are now ahead? If it's a dry race and the Ferraris waltz away, you'll swear blind that the Ferrari is the better car.. So which is it? Mac or Ferrari?joostlamers wrote:@ TA
Massa did more laps on the softer tyre AND he did more laps when it was dry...
I still think that Ferrari are quicker, and I think that Massa also had a fair amount of fuel onboard. You're entitled to your opinions, as I am to mine, and I will stick by my views.
massa did not beat hamilton because he had more fuel. thats my opinion as well . compare massa's time with p1 and he is slow , that clearly shows and he was doing some long runs in the softs and at the end of the runs when it was raining lightly he was about 3 hundreth of a second behind.TwistedArmco wrote:So what you're trying to tell me Mac are now ahead? If it's a dry race and the Ferraris waltz away, you'll swear blind that the Ferrari is the better car.. So which is it? Mac or Ferrari?joostlamers wrote:@ TA
Massa did more laps on the softer tyre AND he did more laps when it was dry...
I still think that Ferrari are quicker, and I think that Massa also had a fair amount of fuel onboard. You're entitled to your opinions, as I am to mine, and I will stick by my views.